When Rae
Waters ponders the relative mountain of
public criticism of her actions on the
Kyrene School District Governing Board
last year, she tries hard not to let her
skin get too thick, lest she lose
concern for her constituents.
And that’s
no surprise to her colleagues and
supporters, who emphatically defend her
character and her service to Kyrene.
They call
a recall effort launched last year
against Waters “misguided,” and point to
her meticulous devotion to the
decision-making process as evidence of
her competence.
“If you
get a really thick skin, then how do you
care about things?” Waters asked. “If
(criticism) doesn’t get to me, I guess
to me it would mean that I wasn’t
caring.”
A vote in
favor of a controversial change in
middle school scheduling—as well as
accusations from some parents that
Waters blatantly disregarded their input
on the issue—thrust Waters into the
spotlight last year. In May, angry
parents launched an effort to remove her
from office.
Parents
collected enough signatures to force a
March 14 recall election which will pit
Waters against Tempe Attorney Patrick
McGill.
The
divisive new schedule extended time in
math, science and social studies
classes, but reduced it in reading and
language arts classes. Meeting times for
elective classes like fine arts and
physical education were reduced from
daily to every other day, and Spanish
was changed from a required course to an
elective.
Waters
stands by her vote, saying it was in the
best interests of Kyrene students, and
that she arrived at her decision after
listening to the community and doing
extensive research.
She
acknowledges that the plan has some
kinks to work out, but says “nothing’s
perfect, there’s always issues.” She
criticized the plan’s opponents for
setting up a “self-fulfilling prophesy”
by prejudging its success.
“If you’re
positive something’s not going to work,
you’re going to make it not work
unintentionally,” she said.
She also
cites her seven years lobbying the U.S.
Congress and the Arizona Legislature as
evidence of her care for Kyrene
students. In fact, she said, she is
going to Washington this month to lobby
for education reforms, particularly to
the No Child Left Behind act, “when my
own self interest would be to stay here
and campaign.”
Two of
Waters’ board colleagues offered strong
defenses and pledged their support in
the March 14 recall election.
Sue
Knudson, who joined Waters in supporting
the controversial schedule change last
March, was particularly critical of the
use of the recall provision in this
circumstance.
“Quite
honestly, I think it’s inappropriate to
recall a board member over one
decision,” said Knudson, who was
ineligible for recall at the time
because her term had just begun.
She also
praised Waters as genuinely interested
in engaging the community and reaching
out to parents and encouraging them to
get involved.
“(Waters)
has devoted years to public education,”
Knudson said. “She’s totally respected
among her peers as board members in the
state of Arizona. I don’t know anyone
who is better at what they do, more
committed to serving the kids of their
school district.”
Board
member Ross Robb, who joined the Kyrene
Governing Board after the controversial
vote took place, stuck up for Waters’
handling of the situation and said it
did not merit a recall, particularly
with a regularly scheduled election for
Waters’ seat in November.
“She made
a difficult vote back in March,” Robb
said. “She thought it out, her
intentions were good, and she made a
vote. And whether you agree or not with
it, I don’t believe it warranted a
recall.”
He went on
to offer an endorsement to Waters’
character and work ethic.
“I’ve got
a great deal of respect, both personally
and professionally, for Rae,” he said.
“I think
that she is a tireless worker on behalf
of not only kids in the Kyrene School
District but in her capacity as
president of the Arizona School Boards
Association.
“I think
she’s a tireless worker on behalf of all
public school students in the state of
Arizona.”
Waters
also counts fellow Kyrene parents and
friends among her staunch supporters,
who contend that the recall is an
unnecessary use of district resources.
“It’s a
major waste of money,” said Robin
Landtroop, a former Kyrene parent and
Waters supporter. “I think people
probably forgot that aspect of it. It’s
simply a disagreement.”
District
officials estimate the cost of the
election to be $53,000 if the 5,000
early ballots are requested, up to
$75,000 if 20,000 voters want to mail in
their ballot.
She also
said that the plan’s critics should
withhold judgment until it has gone
through a three-year, battle-tested
cycle with a class of students.
Landtroop
called the active recall supporters a
“very small group” whose views are not
representative of Kyrene parents as a
whole.
Another
Waters supporter said the recall is
“misguided” and that Waters is an
excellent board member who was just
doing her job.
“I have a
good deal of respect for how she does
her job and the effort that she puts
into it,” said Kathy Renolds, a
Centennial Middle School parent.
“In this
case I agreed with her decision, but I
have not always agreed with her in the
past. But she has a real steely
independence that I think is really
valuable in a board member. I can’t
envision anybody who would be an
adequate replacement for her.”
Last
summer, as the recall organizers were
collecting the necessary signatures to
force the recall election, the dispute
got heated, with a series of newspaper
editorials and letters to the editor
shooting accusations in all directions.
“I think
there’s been a lot of character
assassination,” Waters said. “There have
been things that have been said about
the middle school model, and about the
decisions, and about me personally,
about some of the board members
personally that were just blatantly
untrue.”
She said
she hopes to avoid such viciousness in
the next political fight over the
election itself.
“I’m not
going to go there,” she said.
She did,
however, suggest that McGill, her recall
opponent, was not actively involved in
the Kyrene School District prior to his
school board candidacy.
She said
she was approached by the principals at
the two schools which McGill’s children
attend.
“They came
up to me to say, ‘We have never heard of
him, we’ve never seen him, we don’t know
who he is,’” she recalled.
“So I thought that was kind of
interesting, that even his principals
didn’t know who he was.” |